Keto Go Fit to individual ACA issues, I strongly feel that when people use their coverage and experience the higher co-pays, reduced doctor options, uncovered medical procedures, longer wait times and more, there will be fewer happy insurance policies owners. Then as time passes people will experience even higher premiums, fewer covered procedures, higher co-pays, fewer doctor options, and government subsidies reduced or disappearing completely.

These days there is so much conflicting information about health. There are so many different diets, exercise programs, medications, supplements, and more. It can become overwhelming even if you are an expert on health. Since its Keto Go Fit beginning, osteopathy has looked for answers in nature. In his book Osteopathy: Research and Practice, Andrew Taylor Still wrote, “The Osteopath who succeeds best does so because he looks to Nature for knowledge and obeys her teachings… ” This is a great place to start and is the standard we should strive for.
It seems with so many things labeled “natural” these days, this has lost its meaning. Its definition is no longer clear. Foods that are clearly not natural are allowed to be labeled as such. For example, the FDA allows genetically modified foods (GMO’s) to be labeled as “natural.” What I mean by natural or nature in this case is “as nature intended.” How can a food that is genetically modified be as nature intended? The act of needing to genetically modify something nature created is not what nature intended.

So many things in the past have been successfully marketed where people were led to believe that nature had been improved upon. For example, at one point parents were convinced that baby formula was better than breast feeding. I remember rotating in a pediatrician’s office when I was going through my training. There Keto Go Fit was a mom there who was concerned because she was “only breast feeding” and was worried that that was not sufficient. Were not mother’s bodies designed for this? I had to remind her that most humans that have ever lived on this planet survived solely on breast milk and that was sufficient.

Another example is shoes. Marketing has been so successful with convincing people that shoes are good for our feet, we get offended when people do not wear shoes or we pity them. Most have bought into an unfounded baseless idea that our feet were not designed to walk on concrete and we need shoes to combat the unnatural environment. Anyone has actually walked barefoot in nature knows very well there are very hard surfaces in nature. It is often more forgiving on our feet to walk on concrete. Instead we have deformed our feet, made them less pliable, and less able to cope with the environment and we blame it on the ground. Marketers have successfully led people to believe that “nature did not get it right” when it comes to feet and therefore we need their products. Shoe companies have never provided research evidence for the benefits of their shoes.
